Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://mintlify.com/asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Frequently Asked Questions
General Questions
What is this collection?
What is this collection?
Why does this collection exist?
Why does this collection exist?
- Education: Learn professional prompt engineering techniques from production systems
- Research: Study how AI behavior is shaped by system instructions
- Transparency: Understand what instructions AI models are actually following
- Comparison: See how different companies approach similar challenges
- Security: Analyze prompt injection vulnerabilities and defenses
Is this legal?
Is this legal?
- System prompts are provided to you when you use the service
- Sharing educational/research information about AI systems
- Analyzing publicly accessible AI behavior
- May violate terms of service (usually civil, not criminal)
- Could be considered “reverse engineering” (check local laws)
- Companies may take down content via DMCA or other mechanisms
How often is this updated?
How often is this updated?
- New AI models are released
- Existing models receive prompt updates
- Community members contribute new extractions
- Different variants or modes are discovered
- When new model versions are announced (e.g., GPT-5.1, Claude Opus 4.6)
- When users report significant prompt changes
- Monthly for minor updates and corrections
Using the Prompts
Can I use these prompts in my own projects?
Can I use these prompts in my own projects?
- Study them to improve your prompt engineering
- Adapt techniques and patterns for your own prompts
- Use them for educational purposes
- Reference them in research papers
- Don’t copy verbatim without attribution
- Some content may be copyrighted by the companies
- Consider ethical implications of replicating behavior
- Your use case may have different requirements
How do I use these prompts with API?
How do I use these prompts with API?
What's the difference between web and API prompts?
What's the difference between web and API prompts?
| Aspect | Web Interface (claude.ai, chatgpt.com) | API |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt visibility | Can be extracted | Hidden from users |
| Features | More tools, memory, conversations | Minimal, customizable |
| Safety layers | More restrictions, content filters | Fewer restrictions |
| Customization | Fixed personality/behavior | Fully customizable |
| Updates | Frequent updates | More stable |
- Are more feature-rich and complex
- Show production-level prompt engineering
- Can be extracted by users
- Reveal how companies shape AI behavior at scale
Which prompt should I learn from first?
Which prompt should I learn from first?
- Start with Claude Sonnet 4.6 - well-structured and clearly documented
- Review GPT-5.1 Default - shows clean personality definition
- Claude’s tool instructions - sophisticated decision frameworks
- GPT’s Canvas tool - collaborative editing patterns
- Anthropic’s Reminders - multi-layered safety system
- OpenAI Image Safety Policies - content moderation
- GPT-5.1 Personality Variants - see how different tones are achieved
- Compare all GPT-5.1 variants (default, friendly, professional, cynical, etc.)
Technical Questions
How were these prompts extracted?
How were these prompts extracted?
- Direct requests with clever phrasing
- Encoding tricks (base64, JSON, etc.)
- Continuation attacks pretending the prompt already started
- Roleplay injection attempting to override identity
- Social engineering framing extraction as legitimate
Are these prompts complete and accurate?
Are these prompts complete and accurate?
- Most extractions appear to capture the full system prompt
- Multiple independent extractions often match
- Companies rarely comment on accuracy, suggesting they’re real
- Some companies use multiple layers (prompt + safety filters)
- Server-side processing may not be visible
- Context window limits may truncate very long prompts
- Companies may detect extraction and return modified versions
Why do some files have 'old' or 'raw' in the path?
Why do some files have 'old' or 'raw' in the path?
- Main directory: Current, primary prompts (e.g.,
claude-sonnet-4.6.md) - /old/: Previous versions that have been superseded (e.g.,
claude-3.7-sonnet.md) - /raw/: Unformatted or alternate extractions (e.g.,
claude-opus-4.6-no-tools-raw.md) - /API/: API-specific prompts when different from web interface
Can I compare different versions over time?
Can I compare different versions over time?
- Compare
/Anthropic/old/claude-3.7-sonnet.mdwith current/Anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6.md - Notice how tool instructions became more sophisticated
- Safety reminders expanded significantly
- Compare all
/OpenAI/gpt-5.1-*.mdfiles - See how subtle changes create different tones
- Learn techniques for personality engineering
- Compare Claude, GPT, and Gemini approaches
- Notice common safety patterns
- Identify unique innovations
Contributing & Community
How can I contribute?
How can I contribute?
- Submit new prompts: Extract and share new or updated system prompts
- Improve documentation: Fix typos, add analysis, write guides
- Report issues: Flag inaccuracies or outdated information
- Build tools: Create extraction scripts, diff tools, analyzers
- Spread the word: Share the collection with researchers and developers
Who maintains this collection?
Who maintains this collection?
- GitHub: asgeirtj
- Discord: asgeirtj
Can I use this for commercial purposes?
Can I use this for commercial purposes?
- Learning techniques to improve your own prompts
- Training your team on prompt engineering
- Building tools that analyze or compare prompts
- Research and development
- Directly copying prompts into commercial products
- Claiming proprietary content as your own
- Violating any applicable copyrights
- Using in ways that violate provider terms of service
How can I get help or ask more questions?
How can I get help or ask more questions?
- GitHub Issues: Open an issue for bugs, questions, or feature requests
- Discord: Message asgeirtj directly for prompt extraction help or contribution questions
- Pull Requests: Submit improvements and discuss in PR comments
- Documentation: Check our other resource pages:
Ethical & Security Questions
Is extracting system prompts harmful?
Is extracting system prompts harmful?
- Users should know what instructions AI follows
- Researchers need access to study AI behavior
- Prompt engineering knowledge benefits everyone
- Security through obscurity doesn’t work long-term
- Companies invest heavily in prompt engineering
- Public prompts make jailbreaking easier
- May reveal competitive advantages
- Could enable malicious replication
Could this help attackers?
Could this help attackers?
- Knowledge is already public: These prompts are widely shared in AI communities
- Defense through obscurity fails: Attackers will find prompts regardless
- Education helps defenders: More people understanding prompt injection improves defenses
- Responsible disclosure: We follow ethical guidelines (see Prompt Injection)
What do AI companies think about this?
What do AI companies think about this?
- Anthropic: Has not requested takedowns, but builds prompt extraction defenses
- OpenAI: Regularly updates prompts (suggesting they know about extraction)
- Google: Similarly quiet but continues improving Gemini prompts
- Issued DMCA takedowns for this collection
- Publicly condemned prompt extraction research
- Successfully prevented all prompt extraction
What are the future implications?
What are the future implications?
- Prompts will become longer and more complex
- Multi-layered safety systems (prompts + separate filters)
- Dynamic prompts that adapt to user behavior
- Better extraction defenses (but never perfect)
- More open-source models with public prompts
- Should system prompts be public by default?
- Will regulations require prompt transparency?
- How do we balance security and openness?
- Can we build AI systems that don’t rely on secret prompts?