When Manual Grading is Needed
Certain question types cannot be automatically graded and require manual review:Text Field
Short answer and essay responses need human evaluation for content, reasoning, and accuracy.
File Upload
Uploaded documents, images, or other files must be reviewed manually.
Audio Response
Recorded audio answers require listening and evaluation.
Video Response
Video submissions need viewing and assessment.
Questions marked as “Needs Review” appear in the grading queue until you assign a final score.
Accessing Participant Submissions
View all submissions for a test:Submission View Structure
The submission view organizes data by sections:Section Organization
- Section Header: Section title and description
- Section Attempt: Start time, finish time, duration
- Questions List: All questions in order with answers and grades
Grading Interface
For each question requiring manual grading:Question Display
- Question Text: Full question with any media (images, audio)
- Point Value: Maximum points available
- Participant Answer: Text response, uploaded file, or media recording
Grading Controls
- Score Input
- Feedback
- Review Flag
Assign a score between 0 and the maximum:
Maximum score is determined by the section’s scoring mode (1 point in percentage mode, or custom points in point-based mode).
Grade Data Model
Each graded answer creates or updates a grade record:Score Priority
When both auto and manual scores exist:Grading Workflow
Creating New Grades
When grading a previously ungraded answer:Updating Existing Grades
When regrading an already graded answer:Grading Progress Tracking
Monitor overall grading progress for a test:Progress percentage is calculated as: (gradedAnswers / totalAnswers) × 100
Progress Indicators
- Fully Graded: All answers have grades, no review flags
- Partially Graded: Some answers graded, others pending
- Needs Review: Grades exist but
needsReviewflags set - Not Started: No grades assigned yet
Bulk Grading Strategies
Grade by Question
Grade by Question
Review all participant responses to the same question:
- Ensures consistent grading standards
- Easier to compare answer quality
- Develop rubric as you grade
- Adjust scores if standards shift
Grade by Participant
Grade by Participant
Review all questions for one participant:
- See full context of participant’s work
- Provide comprehensive feedback
- Assess overall understanding
- Better for small participant counts
Grade by Section
Grade by Section
Focus on one section at a time:
- Balance between question and participant approaches
- Complete sections one by one
- Good for tests with distinct section topics
Scoring Modes and Grading
Percentage Mode
Each question worth 1 point:Point-Based Mode
Custom point values per question:Partial credit is always possible in manual grading, regardless of scoring mode.
Feedback Best Practices
Constructive Feedback
Constructive Feedback
- Be specific about what was correct/incorrect
- Explain the reasoning behind the score
- Reference source material for learning
- Encourage improvement without being discouraging
- Use positive language even for low scores
Consistent Rubrics
Consistent Rubrics
- Develop scoring criteria before grading
- Apply same standards to all participants
- Document rubric for future reference
- Adjust all grades if rubric changes
- Share rubric with participants if appropriate
Efficient Feedback
Efficient Feedback
- Create feedback templates for common issues
- Use short codes or references (“See rubric item 3”)
- Balance detail with grading speed
- Prioritize feedback for close-call scores
- Save detailed feedback for struggling participants
Releasing Results
Control when participants see their grades:Partial Grading
If you release results before grading is complete:- Auto-graded questions show scores immediately
- Manually graded questions show “Pending” until graded
- Participant’s total score updates as you grade
- Feedback becomes visible when you submit it
Regrading Scenarios
Correcting Errors
If you made a grading mistake:- Find the participant’s submission
- Update the score and feedback
- Existing grade is updated (not duplicated)
- Participant’s total score recalculates automatically
Adjusting Rubric
If you change grading standards mid-way:- Update rubric documentation
- Regrade already-graded submissions with new standards
- Ensure all submissions use same rubric
- Consider announcing rubric change to participants
Answer Key Corrections
If the answer key was wrong:- Update the question’s correct answer
- System detects existing grades
- Confirm regrade of all affected submissions
- Auto-grading runs again with correct answer
- Manual grades can be adjusted if needed
Automatic regrading only affects auto-graded questions. Manual grades must be updated individually.
Next Steps
View Analytics
Analyze overall test performance and results
Export Results
Download graded results for records
Release Results
Share grades and feedback with participants
Question Types
Learn about different question types