Overview
Lawn’s workflow system helps teams track video progress through review stages. Every video moves through statuses that indicate where it is in your approval process.Workflow Statuses
Each video has one of three workflow statuses:Review
The default status for all new videos. Use this when:- Video is ready for initial review
- Awaiting feedback from stakeholders
- In the review queue
Rework
Indicates the video needs changes. Use this when:- Feedback requires revisions
- Changes requested by client or team
- Video needs to go back to production
Done
Final approved state. Use this when:- All feedback addressed
- Video approved by stakeholders
- Ready for delivery or publication
- No further changes needed
Managing Video Status
Upload your video
When you create a video, it automatically gets “review” status and “public” visibility.
Update status as needed
Any team member can update the workflow status. This allows reviewers to mark videos for rework without needing admin permissions.
Who Can Update Status
Required role: Member or higher- Viewers cannot update workflow status (read-only)
- Members can update any video in their team’s projects
- Admins and owners have the same status update permissions as members
Video Lifecycle
Understand the difference between processing status and workflow status:Processing Status
Tracks technical state:uploading- File being transferredprocessing- Video being transcodedready- Available for viewingfailed- Upload or processing error
Workflow Status
Tracks review state:review- Awaiting feedbackrework- Needs changesdone- Approved
ready while workflow status is review, meaning it’s technically ready to watch but still awaiting approval.
Real-World Workflows
Scenario: Marketing Campaign Review
First review
Marketing lead reviews and requests changes to the ending.
- Updates status to rework
- Leaves timestamped comment with feedback
Revision
Designer makes changes, uploads new version.
- New video starts as review
- Links to previous version in comments
Scenario: Client Video Production
Client feedback
Client reviews via share link and comments.
- Producer marks as rework after reviewing feedback
Iteration cycles
Producer creates revisions, each starting as review.
- Multiple review → rework cycles possible
- All versions tracked in project
Scenario: Social Media Content Queue
Weekly review
Social media manager reviews all pending videos.
- Approves good ones → done
- Requests changes → rework
- Comments on what needs adjustment
Filtering and Organization
Use workflow status to organize your video lists:By Status
- Show only “review” - See what needs attention
- Show only “rework” - Track videos in revision
- Show only “done” - Find approved content
By Priority
Combine status with other metadata:- Recent uploads in “review” (sort by date)
- Videos in “rework” with comments (filter by comment count)
- “Done” videos ready for export (filter by status + date)
Workflow Best Practices
Set Clear Status Guidelines
Define when to use each status: Review:- Ready for feedback
- All known issues fixed
- Awaiting decision
- Specific changes requested
- Not ready for final approval
- In active revision
- Fully approved
- No changes needed
- Ready for delivery/publication
Use Comments with Status Changes
When changing status, always add a comment explaining why:Keep Videos Moving
Avoid letting videos sit in “review” too long:- Set review deadlines (e.g., 48 hours)
- Assign specific reviewers
- Use comments to @mention reviewers
- Regular status check-ins
Version Control Strategy
Decide how to handle revisions: Option 1: New uploads for major revisions- Upload new video with version number in title
- Mark old version as “rework” or “done”
- Link versions in comments
- Replace video file (if supported)
- Update status back to “review”
- Note revision in comments
Response Time Expectations
Set clear expectations for each status:- Review → Feedback within 24-48 hours
- Rework → Revisions within 2-3 days
- Done → Final delivery within 24 hours
Integrating with Comments
Workflow status and comments work together:Status Change Triggers
Use comments to explain status changes:- Update workflow status
- Immediately add comment with reason
- Tag relevant team members
Timestamped Feedback
Leave comments at specific video timestamps:- Helps creators find exactly what needs work
- Reduces back-and-forth communication
- Makes “rework” status more actionable
Resolution Tracking
When marking as “done”, comment to confirm:- All feedback addressed
- Specific approvals given
- Any final notes or delivery instructions
Common Workflow Patterns
Single Approver
- Upload → review
- Approver reviews → done or rework
- If rework: fix and re-upload → review
- Repeat until done
Multi-Level Approval
- Upload → review
- Team lead approves → keep as review (pending client)
- Client reviews → rework or done
- If rework: fix → review → start over
Batch Review
- Upload multiple videos → all review
- Weekly review session
- Bulk approve good ones → done
- Mark others → rework with feedback
- Revised videos → review for next session
Continuous Improvement
- Upload → review
- Gather all feedback before making changes
- Once complete feedback collected → rework
- Implement all changes at once
- Re-upload → review
- Quick approval check → done
Monitoring Workflow Health
Track these metrics to keep workflows healthy:Count by Status
- How many videos in each status?
- Too many in “review” = review bottleneck
- Too many in “rework” = quality issues or unclear requirements
Time in Status
- How long do videos stay in “review”?
- How many revision cycles (review → rework → review)?
- Time from upload to “done”
Completion Rate
- Percentage of videos reaching “done”
- First-time approval rate (review → done without rework)
- Average revisions per video
